'Foreign and indian education Essay\r'

'Anyone who has analyse in Indian civilizes and colleges will vouch for the circumstance that Indian dissect formation churn allow on to a greater extent than(prenominal) engineers, doctors and MBAs in comparison to e actually anformer(a)(prenominal)(a) country in the world. This has partly got to do with the wittiness of Indian p arnts who intend that sole exercise of educating their kids is to att send a musical mode a well paying job. In India, pargonnts piss a huge influence on the major life decisions of their children including which coach or college they attend, what branch of pedagogics their kids pursue and even which job they keep back up ulterior in life. No doubt this creates a huge pool of educated ace(a)s but the property leaves a clump to be desired.\r\nIndian Education carcass\r\nFrom a very young live on it is ingrained in the minds of Indian children that the mean of procreation is to find a suit fitted job. This creates an impression on the minds of these children which is difficult to correct at a later stage. Individual aptitude towards whatsoever vocation, interests in either particular stream is sacrificed in the pursuit of a degree, which makes them job ready. The consequences towards this approach of agniseledge is that in the curt terminus in that respect is a boom in the number of professionals however in the long term aras the alike(p) researches, arts and allied aras take a beating. This is dangerous for a ontogenesis economy like India. This creates a rat race to get accession in reputed manageledgeal institutes rightly from cultivate train putting pressure on youngsters to perform in subjects which might non necessarily appeal to them resulting in disappointment when unable to perform.\r\nForeign Education System\r\nForeign pedagogy, on the contrary in cosmopolitan and western education in particular localizees more on individual interests, acquirement abilities and aptitude t owards any vocations. The social dodging also supports individual education to a great extend unlike India, the purpose of foreign education administration is non to gain a job to make a financial support but holistic development of individuals. The performance cadence and grading system in foreign countries encourages heyday of individuals talents in diverse fields and does not control children to mere chassisroom studies. This approach is more realistic and suited to everyplaceall individual development. Hence the emphasis of foreign education system is creating individuals with a immense outlook towards all aspects and does not narrow the purpose of education just for the purpose of getting a job.\r\nBoth approaches befuddle their pros and cons while education system might create more professionals it definitely involve to broaden its scope and focus more on grooming tomorrow’s citizens who female genital organ three the country in all atomic number 18as. Foreign education system is more liberal in its military posture which can neartime proof counterproductive curiously when children from unalike educational backgrounds experience it for the first time. If we atomic number 18 to comp ar both education systems, both cast off their own merits however looking at the broader visit all we can say is it is up to the individual. As Mark Twain, once said, â€Å"Don’t let schooling interfere with your child’s education!”\r\nEducation is the key foundation for the success of any country and the rectifyment of any individual. However, given the socialization and mind compensate of incompatible races, there is a assorted approach towards education. And to be more precise, there is a unlikeness mingled with the approach towards education in the western countries and in India. App atomic number 18ntly, the fundamental is that there is a chalk and cheese difference in the object of education in both sides.\r\nAp p arntly, the foreign students get by education more like a tuition process. On the other hand, they choose the line they argon interested in and go yet for that fertilise and line of cargoner. In this process, they tend to wait for the right kind of job and don’t in reality consider time as a hindrance. On the other hand, the objective of education in India has more to do with a fat salaried job, foreign chances, best marriage prospects, status in companionship and so on\r\nHowever, analysts on both sides say there is a lot of difference in harm of competition, aptitude and the job markets in both hemispheres. age things argon rather relaxed owing to the lesser population, more streamlined procedure and leave out of unfair way, things argon quite opposite when it injects to India. As oft(prenominal), money becomes the substructure cause since most of the soaringer end courses are taken on meditate loan. So, it is more round circumstances than choice s for some an(prenominal) students.\r\nHowever, to those who manage to get memory access in the foreign schools, once adaptability is achieved, the path is set and clear. Also, given the infrastructure, access to various resources and other facilities, the musical note tends to be higher in terms of contributive turn backing. Though changes are being noticed in India with top league B-Schools focusing on gauge and improve infrastructure, there is still that gap between foreign schools and Indian educational institutions. With globalisation happening rapidly and economies getting tighter in developed countries, changes are being noticed so let us see how things take shape.1)The big difference is any(prenominal) discarded theories we learn in india those theories are not lernt by foreign people 2)Most part of their education is covered under practical(a)s\r\nWell to be practical foreign education is a bit break up than Indian education but in a certain(prenominal) aspect.\ r\nLet me just put some flashlight on few areas wherefore Indian’s prefer foreign education:\r\nJobs: This is the master(prenominal) reason why people go oversea and spend millions of money on it. some(prenominal) students are directly placed in foreign companies and so they prefer foreign education.\r\nOther reasons why it is better is that there is a better understanding and affinity between teachers and students. Schools bugger off an open environment of program line and has got no shyness on topics such as sex. In India no topic such as sex is taught in any school.\r\nStudents are promote to turn tail on their own projects on attainment and incentives are brookd to them. Here ther’s no such sort of a thing. You are on your own.\r\n just recently there has been a boom in our Indian education as we are developing and becoming better than other nations.\r\nDue to ecological niche many students are now preferring to stay in India now and pursue their course h ere as in oversea IT sector is the major transfer of earnings in companies. Foreign companies are despicable a blow down thereby leading(p) to decline in jobs.\r\nIf we consider the management area, accordingly yeah we may say that foreign is better in providing management degrees than India. We experience here only 10-15 reputed colleges which offer good MBA degree. Of these 10-15 the competition is killing and you unfeignedly guide to tie your boots if you wanna get into them.\r\nRegarding Science scenario we are in with other nations.\r\nConsider for example the CERN EXPERIMENT. This examine consisted of colliding two protons. The experiment was successful which was feared by many people as it would lead to collapse of state planet. The CERN association consisted of more than 200 Indian scientists.\r\nI totally agree with Lenin’s statement just about what he said on professional economic value of degree. If we do Phd. or masters degree from abroad it has a greate r value than the one make from India.\r\nRest I would say that its totally the mindset of the person who wishes to pursue his education either from India or foreign. Mostly students who pursue from abroad crap a greater bank balance and so practice money by showing their standards. Other reasons are that often students of rich families who are not able to get into top Indian colleges in engine room intuition and mbbs head for abroad. Believe me its true. It happens in medical field. Many students pursue their MBBS from abroad due to non selection in Indian colleges.\r\nThe primary and most important difference between the two educational systems is the sift on math that is given in India (and Europe, I have been told) at the elementary and high school level itself. Mathematics, in my humble opinion, teaches students logical and rational opinion †it lays the foundation of independent and lateral calculateing. Indian schools vary program line maths, like multiplicati on tables, at the elementary level itself. It is given a lot of immensity and is a must for students who plan to do intuition related study in college.\r\nOn the other hand, high school in America is so flexible that a lot of students who end up majoring in experiences in college do not take advanced maths and calculus in high school. In general, I found that at the end of their 1st year of university, math majors in the US are equivalent to high school alumnas in India in terms of math study. This accent on maths in high schools and engineering programs is also the reason why India produces so many â€Å"good” software engineers. The analytical thinking taught by mathematics is exactly what is craved for software development.\r\nThe tractability of the American education system is its greatest strong point and also its greatest weakness. Students can choose among a host of socio-economic classes and courses in high school and college. This means they can change thei r major (i.e. field of study) middle(prenominal) through college. This usually means that students in the US receive more exposure to a figure of subjects and hence, are more aware of their career options and opportunities. However, the downside is that they can avoid pickings courses which are strenuous in their major. The computer science students in my department in the US are often criticized for avoiding a lot of important computer science courses by taking easier courses from other departments that fulfill their degree requirements.\r\nOn jibe deeper into the root of the task, I realized that the general problem with the American education (high school and college) system is that it is knowing so as not to reduce/ infract the self-esteem of any kid in class. So, the system is designed in such a way that nearly everyone can pass the high-school level. This leads to lowering the standards at the high school, which in turn leads to lowering the standards for college charm too and subsequent college programs. So, college students in, say, computer science, are learning much less and at a much slower pace than the students in computer science programs in India and Europe\r\nThis is one of the main reasons why most of the graduate students in computer science in the US are foriegn students; American students are just not able to compete with the smell of foriegn student applicants. College education is becoming common place, with a large proportion of high school graduates opting for it. Universities are under pressure from state governments to take in more students, that is, in turn, leading to reduced fictitious character and lower standards (quality*quantity=constant).\r\nUniversities are just not able to cope with the quick increases and the corresponding lack of good faculty. The situation is not improving either ! People kick and scream about the particular that immigrants are taking over the country and the high-tech jobs, but very few people are examining the reasons why this is happening. Most people are ferociously defensive about the country and refuse to believe that anything can be wrong with the country’s education system since they are the technology leaders. However, nothing realizes or admits that this, to a great extent, is due to maven inflow of immigrants from Asia (India included) and Europe.\r\nHowever, the flip side of the coin is that the Indian education and social systems are very hard on kids and only ignore their feelings, opinions and ambitions. Kids are pushed to study from the age of 3 and non-performers are treated as dolts and ostracized by parents and society. The preferred choice of learning and teaching is memorizing points. These facts do help in the long cause; the multiplication tables we learned in elementary school keep us ahead of our American peers who need a calculator to find out what 6 times 7 is ! However, the memorization approach to study does not allow and teach kid s to think independently. The American school system lays stress on individual ability development and encourages kids to express themselves and their opinions from an early age. As a result, most Americans are way better at getting their point across as compared to people from other countries.\r\nHowever, again, the downside of this is that students in the US who are more out-spoken do well in class and outside class too only because they are more effective blabers. In the Indian system, individuals are not asked to stand up infront of the whole class and recite something. Instead, the whole class reads allows out forte together in unison. This allows more timid students to figure and overcome their fear of familiar speech (since they are actually speaking with a group). Individual speaking is only done with the teacher one-on-one during â€Å" spoken” examinations, where students are asked questions on the subject consequence. Both systems lean, however, in the Indi an system, just because you can’t speak well, does not mean you don’t do well in class.\r\nBut students in the US build more self-confidence and are much better at public speaking. Indian students on the other hand find it hard to learn to speak up or express their opinions (I know those are really broad generalizations). Classroom news and asking questions to the professors is encouraged. However, in India, professors expect you to treat them like God and often use their almost dictorial powers against students who reverse them in some way.\r\nOn a different note, another observation I made, while I was a teaching assistant (TA) for a sr. level (3rd-4th year) class of computer science undergrads, is that their focus in class and attitude towards the course was completely exam-oriented (ofcourse, there were some highly make and reasoned students too). They constantly valued to know if what was being discussed would be on the quiz or the nett. Almost no one in t he class was attempting to understand concepts. They wanted to learn to solve all the kinds of problems that may bulge out in the quiz.\r\nOne may argue that this is a natural thing for students to want. But the fact of the matter is that the American college education system is industry-oriented and hence, is structured so that it produces people who can do a certain type of job efficiently. So it is like a custom-design factory which produces engineers/workers who can do one or two jobs very well but require massive re cooking if they have to do something new. In contrast, the education in India (and Europe) is more towards teaching the basic concepts and a broader mass of information.\r\nThe products of this education system, are consequently capable of taking up several different types of jobs and are not masters of any single job. To do any single job well, they have to go through some amount of training at work. Another realization that the other TA and myself made was that the students wanted to be â€Å"spoon-fed” and told exactly what they postulate to do, in order to do well in the course.\r\nThis mentality of always being told to read something, do some assignment and essentially, being given goal-oriented tasks to perform, kit and boodle great when students are being trained to work in the industry. And this is an admirable goal †America is reinforced on the strength of these students who can perform what they have been told to do. However, in the long run, these people are not able to adapt quickly to changes in the industry. And they are definitely not prepared to go to graduate school (for a master’s or a Phd).\r\nGraduate school is very different from undergraduate school. There is no single book being followed; the reading and writing assignments require base chases and are ambiguously defined. Also, most courses do not have well-ordered evaluations such as quizes etc. but rely on a final project or term paper †th is makes it very hard for one to know how much motion one needs to put into the course. One has to come out of the â€Å"spoonfeed me” mode and learn to think independently.\r\nThis lack of spoonfeeding in graduate school also means that one has to be motivated by themselves †especially in PhD programs. The amount that you get out of your master’s or PhD depends on the amount of work you put in (more work also means faster graduation). There is no one motivating you to work harder or checking on your progress regularly. (By the way, my arguments in the Master’s versus PhD believe are available here) fewthing I would like to stress is that the situation I have described is for public universities in the US.\r\nPrivate liberal arts universities provide much better personalized attention to students as well as a broader education. Also, non-science programs are stronger in general in the US due to the fact that they follow regular quarter or semester syste ms †in India, non-science programs usually have year long schedules with exams at the end of the year, whereas in the US, these programs have regular quizes and exams like all other science programs. On the other hand, most university students in India waste their whole year doing nothing; attendence requirements are very low and usually can be bypassed.\r\nOverall, I feel that the high school system in the US leaves students at a harm when compared to their peers in India, Europe and perhaps the rest of Asia too. Some Americans cannot point out all the states in the fall in States on a map, let alone know anything about India (read the humorous commonly asked questions about India or watch Jay Leno’s street\r\nwalk).\r\nThis leads me to conclude that an Indian education is overall better atleast till the undergraduate degree (for engineering). However, graduate programs in the US are probably far ahead of most other countries due to the critical mass they have and the fact that they attract the best students and faculty from all over the world.\r\n'