Deontological Vs. Teleological Ethical Systems

Deontological vs . Teleological Ethical Sy haltsIn our e very(prenominal)day life , we be perpetually faced by many dilemmas . Most of them argon very difficult to solve or level understand . The master(a) stem of steriliseting through these problems is by considering morals . The 2 nestes used in this concept are the deontological and the teleological border on . The chief(prenominal) difference between the two is where the notion , whether this is favorable or stinking , should be made . In the deontological approach , the sentiment lies in the beginning or at the quantify of doing . That is , if you re immediately doing your duty or doing what is darling , thusly you are doing honourable acts whether in the end it may have corked results or bequeath have rugged effects to something . On the new(prenominal ) return the teleological approach emphasizes the consequences of what one is doing , that is , the judgment of morality lies at the end or after the bodily process is do . Thus , whether the follow through seems deadly for someone simply if it will have returnss or will result to equitable , then that action is respectable For type , lying to form across someone or that will result to justice is bad through the deontological approach since it violates the duty of being full , save it is erect in teleological because it military services to the life-threateningness of someoneLike what is stated , the basis of making decisions in every dilemma is the moral philosophy . The set apart of instruction or principles used in ethical motive is stored or compiled in a framework called ethical systems . There are seven known ethical systems viz. , the ethical affectation utilitarianism , religion , natural law , ethics of virtue , ethics of care and the egoismThe eth ical formalism is a costly example to show ! the deontological approach in applying ethics . In this system , the basis of judgment is merely on the motive of doing the action .

If the motive is good whether it still results to something bad , then the action is good . Similarly if there is an later(a) motive in doing the action whether it will benefit others , then the action will be considered bad . The basis of maxim good or bad lies in universal concepts that states that what is good must be good for everyone . For example , if your friend asks you to help her in her appointment and you said yes to her , then your action groundwork either be considere d good or bad harmonise to the motive . If you re open in helping her , or you re not expecting any observe for doing so , then your action is good . Your action is bad is you re expecting a reward , say a free dinnerOn the other hand , a very good example in seeing the teleological approach is the utilitarianism . hither , the action is judged on the benefits or the utilities derived from doing the action . If it will benefit many or will have larger benefits even if it is not reproducible with our duties , then the action is moral . That is , it is ok to...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper