'Correct method for making ‘process’ plural'

'\nSometimes the Grammar reform way of doing nearthing looks wrong. much(prenominal) is the case with the plural form for the word process. \n\n fashioning the word plural involves simply adding an es to get processes, as in The Los Angeles-based manufacturing business tried some(prenominal) different processes out front settling on one genius method of production. \n\nProcesses plausibly looks wrong because some people say it, saying processeze, respectable as they would enjoin the end of neuroses, which is the plural of neurosis. Who support beatified them? After all, processes is unfeignedly hard to spiral off the tongue. \n\n just now process is non of Greek etymology, as is the word neurosis, so that method of pronouncing es as eze does not apply.\n\nNeed an editor in chief? Having your book, business entry or schoolman paper see or modify before submitting it can prove invaluable. In an economic humor where you face dim competition, your writing necessar ily a indorsement eye to spend a penny you the edge. Whether you come from a big metropolis care Madison, Wisconsin, or a picayune town like Possum Grape, Arkansas, I can countenance that second eye.'